The International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) is a helpful tool used to diagnose a personality disorder. Order the IPDE from PAR today!. Objective: To test the reliability and applicability of Urdu translation of the International personality disorder examination (IPDE) in a psychiatric outpatient. The International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) is a semistructured clinical interview compatible with the International Classification of Diseases.
|Country:||Bosnia & Herzegovina|
|Published (Last):||17 October 2010|
|PDF File Size:||5.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The IPDE was then administered by one of the two raters according to a preset randomized schedule. Background Information, Work, Self, Interpersonal Relationships with open-ended inquiries provided at the beginning of each section to enable a smooth transition from the previous section.
The probability of disordef and receiving effective treatment from psychiatric services varies according to demography, degree of disability and diagnosis. Prevalence, correlates, and disability of personality disorders in the United States: The page Scoring Booklet contains a scoring page for each personality disorder. The major issue however remains with generalization of these findings.
The analysis was carried out using SPSS v.
Those who scored positive on screening were evaluated in a detailed interview using IPDE. Find articles by Fatima Bukharie. Support Center Support Center. Includes training materials, lunch and refreshments.
International Personality Disorder Examination
Forensic Applications of the International Personality Disorder Examination (CPD event)
FB and FH received training to conduct the study, led data collection and did data entry, and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. Farooq Naeem 6 Dr. Majority of patients had more than one personality disorder. Pak J Med Sci.
International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE) CPD event | University of Manchester
However, this is hardly surprising considering, only patients who were suspected to have a personality disorder were included pide our study. Linguistic equivalence was assessed through back- translation and conceptual equivalence through opinion of mental health experts. This was followed by emotionally unstable impulsive type rater one assessed 18 patients and rater 2 assessed 19 patients and joint agreement was found in 18 patients phi correlation of 0.
For translation, dieorder was taken from World Health Organization. There is a need to further this work in different populations and using better methodology.
Inclusions of only ijternational who were suspected to have a personality disorder could be another source of bias. World health organization; National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. Correlation coefficient for dimensional scores between the two raters was 0. Patients considered to have a personality disorder were referred by mental health professionals to the research team without the use of diagnostic criteria.
The final Urdu draft was obtained after incorporating modifications suggested by experts following a feasibility examiantion on 5 outpatients. A good mix and balance of theory, practice and discussion. For each IPDE Interview question, the corresponding personality disorder and the specific diagnostic criterion is identified with precise scoring guidelines.
Examinatioh articles by Fareeha Hamid. However they were all found to have a personality disorder both on screening and detailed examination using IPDE. Keeping in view that the basic assessment tool should be culturally applicable and reliable and easily understandable by local people, it was translated into different languages e.
To test the reliability and applicability of Urdu translation of the International personality disorder examination IPDE in a psychiatric outpatient population in Pakistan. Usefulness of the International Personality Disorder Examination Screening Questionnaire for borderline and impulsive personality pathology in adolescents. Both interviewers scored patients independently and were not allowed to share the results perzonality or after the interviews.