CURRENCY WARS SONG HONGBING PDF

CURRENCY WARS SONG HONGBING PDF

admin

June 28, 2020

: Currency Wars 2: World of Gold Privilege (Chinese Edition) ( ): song hong bing: Books. world by launching the opening salvo in what he called a “currency war.” Man- tega claimed that emerging Hongbing, Song. Huobi Zhanzheng. There is no english version of this book. Language:Chinese,polish,Japan,French ,Viatnamese,Koriean You can Read it by translating in Look For In.

Author: Jujinn Tule
Country: Malaysia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 9 February 2011
Pages: 57
PDF File Size: 9.52 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.43 Mb
ISBN: 953-2-54155-626-6
Downloads: 86098
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shashicage

I first want to say that this book is filled with conspiracy theories and nationalistic ideas. This is the mysterious question the author asks. Actually, this family has accumulated its wealth well hongibng years ago starting from Currrency. The rise of Rothschild family begins in when the Battle of Waterloo between England and France ignited. At the time, Rothschild family was devoting to bank management.

They had international banks around Europe such as Germany, France, and England. The family had vast network of industrial spying agency. Therefore, the Rothschilds had an efficient network for market informations. When the Battle of Waterloo began, the Rothschilds instantaneously realized that they will earn tremendous amount of money.

China bestseller sees plots and profit in financial crisis

Many people were betting their whole wealth by buying national bonds of either England or France. If England loses the battle, the national bonds will be worthless. Conversely, if France loses this battle, the price of French national bonds will fall dramatically.

Therefore many people were betting their fortunes on the Battle of Waterloo. The Rothschilds family, using their vast spy network, succeeded in finding out the result of the battle, one day faster than the government. Everyone was nervous in the appearance of Nathan Rothschild in the stock exchange. Nathan ordered his agents to sell tremendous amount of British stocks.

The British has lost to the French. The stocks exchange was in chaos. The stocks became a worthless piece of paper in a minute.

La guerre des monnaies

Nathan Rothschild then immediately told his agents to buy all of the stocks. British government was also victorious in the Battle of Waterloo, however, in a long run they were losers. As Rothschild family seized all of the stocks in England, they seized the right of Bank of England. The family then forced the British government to pay their loan for a long battle by tax. So the family was successful in seizing the rights of imposition of taxes. By seizing the Bank of England, the family of Rothschild exercised power and dominance by controlling the supply of currency.

Here are the quotes relating to the dominance of currency. Like Amsel Rothschild what said, Rothschilds used currency as a mean of exploiting wealth from people with out being noticed. In the past, gold was used as a mean of currency. Gold has a limited amount of money, and it was perfect in serving as a currency. If you know the common sense of finance, the infinite supplying of currency will cause an inflation.

  EL ULTIMO PATRIARCA NAJAT EL HACHMI PDF

For example, if a person named John has one dollar, it would not worth a dollar after the inflation. As a result, Jon will lose sums of his wealth. Rothschilds used this method in order to exploit wealth from people.

They increased the supply of money in order to decrease the wealth of people. Once it has decreased its price, Rothschilds bought the wealth away from people. After they have bought such things as stocks from people, the Rothschilds limited the supply of money.

This caused deflation and increased in value or worth of currency. As a result, Rothschilds increased their wealth to tremendous amount. Later on, the Rothschilds used these kinds of methods to manipulate the stocks and gained vurrency. They also stirred wars around the world to make profit. In conclusion, Rothschilds expanded their financial empire by dominating national banks curency the world such as Federal Reserves of United States, and etc.

Hongbinv its rest of the pages, the book illustrated about how finance and currencies operate. Also, it deals with the problem of paper notes as a currency. Through out the book, I did not or tried not to believe the claims stated in the book. I knew that some of the stories have been too much dramatized. However, I feared in a sense that this could be a reality because the writer Song Hongbing has given out specific wong through out the book, which supporting his claims strongly.

La guerre des monnaies by Song Hongbing

In sum, it was too complicated for a high school student to understand the functionality of currency and finance in the book, however, I think I understood most of the important aspects crurency currency. There could be hundreds of individuals in one family. Therefore, it could be possible that the book was wrong about how Bill Gates is not the richest man in the world.

However, doing simple math it could be easily known that there are individuals within the Rothschild family that has more wealth than Bill Gates. For example, billion divided by would equal to 50billion. This would mean that individuals have more wealth than sonng Bill Gates has 40billion.

However, the wealth would not be distributed equally like equal slices of pizzas. The distribution of the wealth within the family will be concentrated in the middle and it disperses to other individuals.

I still believe that Bill Gates is the richest man in the world. November 1, 9: November 1, I agree with that it is somewhat weird to compare a group of people with a person. November 3, But I do think it is a good book, so good on you. So, I got your point, ssong. November 3, 1: Do you expect a family to be over 50 people?

It was just my maximum approximation. So I think it is legitimate to compare the family to Bill Gates. November 7, But you got it wrong again, Sang. It refers to the network of the people who are direct, or indirect relatives or family members of one another in the Rothschild pedigree. I did a bit of research on the family; it only took about 10 minutes, and although Wikipedia only has up to the late s proportion of the Rothschild pedigree, and though the pedigree only includes a small section of the Rothschild bloodline, it showed 29 people who were probably alive altogether during the late s.

  IFAL BITKILER AHMET MARANKI PDF

Henceforth, I consider it illegitimate. Person A could be failing in snog or 3 of his subjects, so he must have a low GPA. Now, Sang, I feel like my comments have lacked positivity and more encouraging feed-backs.

So I would like to focus on the brighter side of the brilliant article-post you made here on this Chinese bestseller. November 9, But lets consider this: Bill Gates is a person. However, his wealth cannot be said to be only his.

Divide by hontbing and you will get Individual Rothschild will have a wealth of This proves that Bill Gates has less money than the owners of Rothschild Family.

Also, you said that most of Rothschild Family today have the pedigree that only includes a small section of the Rothschild bloodline. However, these people were strict in the marriage and all those stuff. They only married people within their family. Now, I feel that I am being stubborn in this subject. I feel that its just the different point of views that makes this society a liberal and censor-less society. And by the way, why did you erase my comment on your blog post about African kid?

November 9, 1: Letting passion take over you in a debate or a discussion yongbing any kind is, for a lack of a better word, committing suicide. Anyways, first and foremost, I wish you could delete comment 7. You should have written: I never thought of that.

I actually saw a lot of those in your article posts. The reason Bill Gates has so many stocks of Microsoft — instead of possessing cash — is because: Now, in light of your second argument, I would like to discard the argument itself because it, again, is based on an arbitrary hypothetical that has its genesis in your own imaginations. Finally, regarding your question in comment 9: Yes, I did erase the comment, but I think you know the reason better than anyone else.

I hate it when people pretend like they are some no-brain, ignorant, asinine beings.

The fact of the matter is: Nonetheless, I will provide my rationale, though you may not perceive it as a reason compelling enough.