May 7, 2020

COBIT self-assessment guide using COBIT / Subjects: COBIT (Information technology management standard) · Information technology > Evaluation. The COBIT PAM adapts the existing COBIT content into an ISO An alignment of COBIT’s maturity model scale with the international standard Assessor qualifications and experiential requirements .. (COSO Guidance ). ISACA has designed and created COBIT® Self-assessment Guide: Using COBIT ® 5 (the ‘Work’) primarily as an assessor . The Measurement Framework.

Author: Mukree Vudorisar
Country: Nicaragua
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 19 May 2010
Pages: 364
PDF File Size: 15.45 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.89 Mb
ISBN: 611-9-49131-255-7
Downloads: 89150
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Magrel

The plan, including the assessment schedule and logistics for site visits is reviewed and approved.

To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy. My interpretation would be that: Input Process Output Brief the organisational unit on the performance of the assessment: Answer any questions or concerns assessoor they may have.

Record the set of process attribute ratings as the process profile and calculate the capability level rating for each process using the Capability Level Ratings criteria. Finalise the assessment report and distribute to the relevant parties.

The report also covers any key issues raised during the assessment such as observed areas of strength and weakness and findings of high risk.

Enterprises will, said the security association, be able to use it to perform non-evidence-based capability assessments to serve usign a precursor review to a formal assessment. Step 1 Identify relevant business drivers for the IT processes assessment.

ISACA publishes COBIT process assessment model – Infosecurity Magazine

Resources and information necessary for performing the process are identified, made available, allocated and used. Initiation Identify the sponsor and define the purpose of the assessment: There is only enough time today to walk through the assessment process at a very high level.


Provide the Assessment Record to the sponsor for retention and storage. Define the scope of the assessment: Ensure that for each process assessed, sufficient evidence exists to asessor the assessment purpose and scope.

Assessment outputs desired by the sponsor in addition to those required as part of the assessment record are identified and described. All other levels and attributes PA2. Developed Documented together with An assessment schedule Identify the project scope Secure the necessary resources to perform the assessment Determine the method of collating, reviewing, validating and documenting the information required for the assessment Co-ordinate assessment activities with the organisational unit being assessed The Assessment Planning giide includes such things as: The assessor then reaches a conclusion as to the extent to which the attribute has been achieved.

For each process, relate the evidence to defined process indicators. Note that this is the level where the detailed and specific process requirements from the Process Reference Model are used.

ISACA’s COBIT® Assessment Programme

REVEAL Process results or performance Management of work products of the process Management of the process performance Definition of the process Deployment of the process Measurement and control of the process Innovation and optimisation guids the process Lets take a look at a couple usibg these in a little more detail so you can get a sense for what they mean.

My presentations Profile Feedback Log out. Observed areas of strength and weakness Findings of high risk, i. Data Collection The assessor obtains and documents an understanding of the process es including process purpose, inputs, outputs and work products, sufficient to enable cobot support the assessment Data required for evaluating the processes within the scope of the assessment are collected in a systematic manner The strategy and techniques for the selection, collection, analysis of data and justification of the ratings are explicitly identified and demonstrable Each process identified in the assessment scope is assessed on the basis of objective giude To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors.


Are interfaces between the involved parties managed to ensure effective communication and clear assignment of responsibility? What constraints, if any, apply to the assessment? Outcomes Os Number Description DS1-O1 A service management framework is in place to define the organisational structure for service level management, covering the base definitions of services, roles, tasks and responsibilities of internal and external service providers cogit customers.

In some cases, the evidence of process performance may be used as evidence of process capability. In addition, simplified guidance has been developed in a Self-assessment Guide to completing assessments for those wanting to perform a simple, judgement based self assessment as a precursor to a more formal compliant assessment.

Traceability shall be maintained between the objective evidence collected and the process attribute ratings assigned.

Which processes are being assessed? By browsing Infosecurity Magazine, you agree to our use of cookies. Usign next attributes relate to management of the process and associated work products: Julia Richards and R. We will quickly review cobot key elements of each of these activities.

Present the assessment results to the participants. Ensure that the data collected is correct and objective and that the validated data provides complete coverage of the assessment scope. Work products are reviewed in accordance with planned arrangements and adjusted as necessary to meet requirements.

Verify the completeness of the data.