Just as with C++, the standards committee maintains a public archive, which includes proposals for additions and defect reports: sc2. (This Rationale is not part of American National Standard X, but is included for .. Programming in C Markup by [email protected], revising the International Standard for the C programming language; and it retains .. not a rationale for the C language as a whole: the C89 Committee was .
|Published (Last):||11 December 2015|
|PDF File Size:||11.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Many people who criticize the C programming language, do not understand its goals.
C99 – Wikipedia
This is just quotations from the introduction part of the Rztionale Rationale. The design comittee for the C99 standard declared eleven principles to guide the process.
Here is the list. The rationale contains more details.
c89 – Rationale for pre-C99 C not having initial declarations in for loops? – Stack Overflow
Although it strove to give programmers the opportunity to write truly portable programs, the C89 Committee did not want to force programmers rationa,e writing portably, to preclude the use of C as a “high-level assembler”: There are many facets of the spirit of C, but the essence is a community sentiment of the underlying principles upon which the C language is based. Some of the facets of the spirit of C can be summarized in rqtionale like:. The last proverb needs a little explanation.
The potential for efficient code generation is one of the most important strengths of C. An example c9 this willingness to live with what the machine does can be seen in the rules that govern the widening of char objects for use in expressions: The 11 Principles The design comittee for the C99 standard declared eleven principles to guide the process.
Existing code is important, existing implementations are rxtionale C code can be portable C code can be non-portable Avoid “quiet changes. Keep the spirit of C. Codify existing practice to address evident deficiencies.
Minimize incompatibilities with C Some of those points are so interesting that I want to quote more from the document. Non-portable C Ratuonale it strove to give programmers the opportunity to write truly portable programs, the C89 Committee did not want to force programmers into writing portably, to preclude the use of C as a “high-level assembler”: Some of the facets of the spirit of C can be summarized in phrases like: Keep the language small and simple.
Provide only one way to do an operation. Make it fast, even if it is not guaranteed to be portable.